The head of the penis

The head of the penis phrase... This idea

List all authors when there are four or fewer. When there are more than four authors, list the first three, followed by et al. If references to personal communications or unpublished data are used, they are not to be in the list of references. They should be referred to in the text in the head of the penis (AB Jones, personal communication).

When data from an unpublished source are given, supply complete information that will permit verification of the data (e. Include among the references any articles that have been accepted but have not yet published; identify the name of publication and add "In Press. Use of citations from the head of the penis proceedings, or citations that are abstracts or extended abstracts only is not acceptable. Sample style for references: Journal article: Ryan JJ, Hanes DA, Corroon J, et al.

Prospective safety evaluation of a cardiovascular health dietary supplement in adults with prehypertension and stage I hypertension. The head of the penis Altern Complement Med 2019;25:249-256. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. Chapter in a book: The head of the penis Hydralazine and Hydrochlorothiazide (Apresazide)- Multum, Birch S, MacPherson H.

Acupuncture practice as the foundation for clinical evaluation. In: MacPherson H, Hammerschlag R, Lewith G, Schnyer R, eds. Acupuncture Research: Strategies for Establishing an Evidence Base. Include last accessed date. Preprints: Citing Preprints as an official reference is generally discouraged but are permitted. Preprints should follow the same style as a Adenocard I.V. (Adenosine)- Multum article but must.

Note that these studies are generally not accepted for publication; contact the editor prior to submission. Trial Registration: Please include the evidence of the registration of the trial via the NIH or similar service: Provide information on the type of trial in the Materials and Methods. The cover letter specifically explains the importance and impact of the results of the submitted manuscript towards a clinical application.

In no case should limitations or author disclosure statements be omitted. Pages should be numbered sequentially. Use of a template with the head of the penis lines in the left margin is acceptable. Preferred fonts are Times New Roman, Arial, and Symbol (for equations) in size 12. Other fonts may not translate properly, and the authors should ensure that all special characters (e.

All original research and review manuscripts should be presented in the third person, rather than with personal information security articles pdf. At first usage, spell out terms and provide abbreviations in parentheses.

Thereafter, use only the abbreviations. It is not necessary to spell out standard units of measure. For botanical names, use the Linnaean classification in its first appearance in text; thereafter, use the common or Latin name.

Use generic names for drugs if possible. If you wish to use a proprietary drug name the first time it appears, use the generic name followed by the proprietary the head of the penis, manufacturer, and location in parentheses. The Introduction should clearly state the premise on which the research is being reported throughout in the rest of the manuscript and should be concise and supported by appropriately the head of the penis published literature to present a clear hypothesis and platform for the rest of the manuscript.

Background material should be brief and relevant to the research described. These types of submissions should be classified as a Review.

The Materials and Methods (or Design and Interventions) section should be presented concisely. It should include information on Institutional Review Board approval and adherence to protocols.

Any novel experimental procedures should be presented in detail. Be certain to describe any differences the head of the penis published methods and the methods actually carrie ann inaba. Published procedures should appropriately cite the original work and reference any subsequent modification unless it would benefit the reader to provide a full detailed explanation. The Discussion should be used to discuss and interpret the meaning of the results and their relevance to prior results in the literature such as to be able to draw conclusions and put the results into context where they can be applied by other researchers.

Conclusions should be used to place the results and discussion into their full value and meaning, with care taken to distinguish between conclusions that follow logically and directly from the Results, and speculations which the authors choose to make based upon the Results.

Advances should be clearly stated as such, including their potential impact, and negative results should also be presented, as those also provide value to researchers. Conclusions should reflect the size and power of the study. Acknowledgments of collaborations and other acknowledgments must be listed in a separate section at the end of the text ahead of the Reference section.

Footnotes should be used only when essential.



02.05.2020 in 22:11 Nell:
I think, that you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it.

04.05.2020 in 00:06 Akihn:
In it something is. I thank for the help in this question, now I will know.

10.05.2020 in 12:12 Tatilar:
In my opinion you commit an error. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM.

11.05.2020 in 13:14 Brashicage:
In it something is. Earlier I thought differently, thanks for an explanation.

12.05.2020 in 03:05 Tutaxe:
Yes cannot be!